Links
Home
Oracle DBA Forum
Frequent Oracle Errors
TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
Backtrace message unwound by exceptions
invalid identifier
PL/SQL compilation error
internal error
missing expression
table or view does not exist
end-of-file on communication channel
TNS:listener unknown in connect descriptor
insufficient privileges
PL/SQL: numeric or value error string
TNS:protocol adapter error
ORACLE not available
target host or object does not exist
invalid number
unable to allocate string bytes of shared memory
resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
error occurred at recursive SQL level string
ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
archiver error. Connect internal only, until freed
snapshot too old
unable to extend temp segment by string in tablespace
Credential retrieval failed
missing or invalid option
invalid username/password; logon denied
unable to create INITIAL extent for segment
out of process memory when trying to allocate string bytes
shared memory realm does not exist
cannot insert NULL
TNS:unable to connect to destination
remote database not found'>ora-02019
exception encountered: core dump
inconsistent datatypes
no data found
TNS:operation timed out
PL/SQL: could not find program
existing state of packages has been discarded
maximum number of processes exceeded
error signaled in parallel query server
ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
TNS:packet writer failure
see ORA-12699
missing right parenthesis
name is already used by an existing object
cannot identify/lock data file
invalid file operation
quoted string not properly terminated
to_number question

to_number question

2004-07-15       - By Wolfgang Breitling

Reply:     <<     31     32     33     34     35     36     37     38     39     40     >>  

I had a response crafted and just when I tried to send it my web mail client
that I 'm forced to use during the day lost connection - and my response in the
process. I 'll try again
Quoting Jonathan Gennick <jonathan@(protected) >:

>
> Then I would argue that it is not I who am bringing
> something into play that violates the rules, but that SQL
> itself is doing so. I fail to see how subqueries in the FROM
> clause can fail to violate the commutativity that you speak
> of.
>
The optimizer is not violating the rules of commutativity, it uses them. You
are violating them by using to expressions where the second expression relies
on the successful evaluation of the first.
If I boil down the query to it basic elements, then I think Stephen 's query is
asking for all rows in the table where cold x contains only numeric digits and,
when interpreted as a number satisfy a numeric expression e.g. is greater than
a constant. In an arbitrary pseudo code language:

is_greater(is_number(col),const) = true

but by the rules of commutativity, Oracle is allowed to execute

is_number(is_greater(col),const) = true

If you write the original query as

select x from t
where decode(translate(col, '0123456789a ', '0123456789),null, 'A ', 'N ') = N
and to_number(col) > const

you immediately recognize that you may be in trouble because you know that you
must not rely on the predicates being evaluated in the order they appear in the
where clause. So now put the first predicate into a inline view thinking that
this way you impose a order of processing. Well, you don 't. The optimizer is
allowed to transform your query "back " into its simpler form.

--
Regards

Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle 7,8,8i,9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com

-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@(protected)
put 'unsubscribe ' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --